| |
Orange & Coriander Chicken... mmmmmm!
Finally got around to writing some of the stuff I cook down.... This ones a fave at the mo...
Orange & Coriander Chicken
3 onions, sliced
5 table spoons, olive oil,
1 knob of butter
4 heaped tea spoons of soft brown sugar
1 finely chopped golden pepper
4 chicken breasts
1/2 bottle of white wine
1 large orange peeled and cut into segmants
Fresh Coriander (20 - 25 stalks worth)
Sea salt
Freshly ground black pepper
Heat the oil and butter in a large pan, then add the onions and brown sugar. Stir on a high heat until the onions become soft, this should take around 5 to 8 minutes.
Turn the heat down (2 - 3 on most electric hobs) and leave without stirring for 25 to 30 minutes until the onions start to look caramelised (the same colour as the brown sugar but NOT burned). They should not burn, however keep your nose peeled for any signs.
After the onions have caramelised bring the heat up and place the chicken breasts on top of the onions so that each piece is touching them as much as possible, turn over after 2 or 3 minutes, the chicken should brown slightly.
Sprinkle the sea salt and ground black pepper (to taste - you dont need too much) on the chicken.
Place the orange segmants on top of the chicken peices and cover with the fresh coriander.
Add the golden pepper and cover with the white wine.
Cook slowly in a pressure cooker on the hob or in a casserole dish at 180c for 1.5 - 2 hours.
Sauce should be think and chicken tender when cooked.
Serving suggestion: Serve with steamed basmati / wild rice mix (with a little salt and olive oil added while cooking) garnished with cherry tomatoes and freshly chopped basil.
[edit] I had this with asparigas (steamed for 3 - 4 minutes then cooked for 1 in butter with ground black pepper, course salt and garlic) that was yummy!
|
|
New Car
OK, let’s say I bought a new car, not that I would ever buy a brand new car because I'd probably spend the money on studio gear or a bigger TV, but just for the purposes of getting my point across, let’s say I go out and spend twenty grand on a brand new car.
I'm driving around, feeling good about myself, riding around in my new ride when I start to come off the slip road onto the M42. Something’s wrong, there is a code on the dash that I have no way of understanding, there’s a strange grating noise from the engine and the car looses power. I restart the car and it whirs into life, tentatively I drive on, a little of my confidence in this vehicle lost.
I drive slowly, not using the car to its full potential because I want to just get to my destination without having to stop and restart the car again, after I finally get home I phone the dealer, they tell me that they have always known about this problem and there was an upgrade to the cars onboard computer needed to fix it; however this wouldn’t be available for my particular model of car for another 6 months or so. and what’s more there would be an upgrade fee, until the upgrade was available I had to simply aviod exceeding 40MPH on the M42!
Apart from being completely ridiculous, a car manufacturer who behaves like this would be all over the news and every consumer rights TV show on the air within weeks..... So why do the software companies get clean away with it?
Apple and Microsoft might come to some peoples minds, but these guys are saints compared to some of the music software developers. This happens across the board.
If I am a studio musician who has a sequencer that supports VST instruments I am likely to want 2 or more instruments.
If 2 popular instruments produced by large companies require security dongles which, when used together in the same computer crash that computer and prevent it from working properly it should be their no1 priority to fix this ASAP, in fact there is no excuse for a product going to market in this state. Instead, blame is chucked around a little, then theres a bicker between companies about who's software is in the wrong, then finally a 3rd party supplyer has to fix a particular .dll or driver.
This could take half a year - thats half a year, owning an expensive piece of software that I cannot use properly, then a new version comes out that fixes the problem, but since its a major upgrade the upgrade fee is £199.
More often than not software (and increasingly hardware) is coming to the market place in a beta form, meaning that it really should only be in the late stages of testing and development but in order to save time and maximise on potential sales the final bit of bug reporting is to be carried out by paying customers.
Would this be acceptable in any other consumer industry? No! So the big question… How and why do they get away with it?
S.Fox 17/09/07 |
|
Power Beyond Melody
How sonic elements of music can be used to communicate.
Sound is everywhere, even a place which most of us would perceive to be silent, or at least with out much (or many) sounds there are hundreds of noises; most of which being ignored by our conscious minds but every one is heard and remembered by our subconscious mind.
Sound can evoke all kinds of feelings and take us back to places we once were but have long forgotten. The sound of a certain type of bell might remind someone of the taste of their school lunch, the sound of someone splashing with a certain type of indoor ambience could, for a second remind one of the smell of chlorine in an indoor pool.
The mind maps sounds to experiences and feelings, just like it does for smells, feelings and sights but add sound to a vision and that same vision could be very disturbing or very funny. Knowing the power of sound and its ability to make the same piece of video footage funny or highly disturbing all on its own we can start to understand how we can make music do the same, often with more ease.
Traditionally in film, sound design would mean basic sounds and effects that we would expect to hear; footsteps, car sounds and the like, only venturing into the experimentally and electronic if it was a sci-fi movie. Music would be scored and recorded by an orchestra and, especially with regards to main stream Hollywood movies, would use clichéd orchestral effects to enhance scenes of extreme emotion, for example love, hatred, anxiety.
The line between sound and music in film can be, especially presently a very fine one and more often than not the roles of composer and Foley artist cross.
Film Foley design in its traditional sense involves simply recreating (usually in an exaggerated form) sounds that we would expect to hear, a plate crashing when its dropped, footsteps, clothes rubbing; Sounds like this cannot usually be captured Satisfactually while filming and so are added later, in its basic form.
Foley can change perception, making footsteps heavier can change the mood of a scene, placing footsteps in the audio track where there is no one visible on the screen tells us that someone is outside our field of view, we can even understand what the weather is like outside when there is no window in shot.
A good understanding of the power of organic sound and the basic primal triggers that certain sonic elements can invoke can be gained by looking at the way Foley has been used for many years. We know that the human mind can be influenced and suggested to by sound in certain contexts but what if we want to convey something less literal?
This is where musical scores for film and television can become very exciting, hinting towards organic sounds but confusing the contexts to give the audience something both familiar and alien at the same time.
With the above taken into account, intelligent combination of the sonic and the melodic can result in the musical element of a story playing a most powerful and creatively exciting role.
S.Fox 07/09/07
|
|

Buy This....
Les Parapluies de Cherbourg
The Umbrellas Of Cherbourg
Buy Now From Amazon.co.uk
Les Parapluies de Cherbourg has been a film that I loved and was intrigued by form the very 1st time I saw a faded print of it shown on UK television many hours past my bed time.
On 1st viewing you could be forgiven for feeling skeptical about this film. However after a short while anyone will realise that there are a quite a few things about this film that make it totally unique, the most obvious of these being that there is no spoken dialogue whatsoever. The whole thing is sung and set to Michelle Legrands' score.
Michelle Legrand writes with minimal thematic material, he uses wonderful 2 – 4 bar hooks that manage to encapsulate the entire mood and intention of the story he’s writing for and then, using a series of variation and sequence development techniques reels us in. It’s very difficult to stop listening to a Legrand melody part way through so think of a melody that runs the entire length of a film, twisting and turning providing the drama, sorrow, anger, happiness that the dialogue delivery would be giving us in any other film.
Suffice to say this film makes for compulsive viewing (and listening). Demy also takes intrinsic states of mind from the characters and plasters them all over the walls and puts them in the action, for example when lovers express love all the walls are painted in clashing bright day-glo paint, outdoors to reflect the characters inner euphoria.
Technically this movie is boundary breaking for a film of its year / budget and the story broke all the rules that Hollywood wrote for a musical love story. Thanks to Demy’s amazing foresight; he shot the movie on Eastman neg. stock to capture the vivid colours he required, however this stock had a very short shelf live so by the 80’s there was no good print of the film available – he had however thought to make 3 negative prints of the separate colours and lock them away, we are able to see the film in its original glory today.
BUY NOW FROM AMAZON.
Starring Catherine Deneuve, Nino Castelnuovo, Anne Vernon, Marc Michel, Ellen Farner, Mireille Perrey
Stuart Fox

|